Marriage can be proven either by the testimony of witnesses, or for the party who denied marriage to him, or to ask the denying party to take the oath that he is not married and refuse to take the oath.
Yes, a claim for proof of lineage or its denial from common-law marriage is accepted
The repugnant customary marriage does not provide for the inheritance of the spouses
The wife has the right to file for divorce without prejudice to her rights in the following cases:
Insulting or beating the wife, lack of spending, the husband’s imprisonment for a period of more than three years, and she is entitled to file a lawsuit after one year, due to impotence (impotence) and leprosy, marriage to another.
The harm intended in the law was not mentioned exclusively in the sense that any harm that the wife can prove is entitled to ask for divorce.
The dowry is the money that a man pays a woman upon marrying her, and it is not a pillar of marriage
That the wife is obedient to her husband and submits herself to him at the time of his request
The alimony debt is not waived even if the spouses have not agreed upon alimony or a judgment is issued for it, and the wife may claim his alimony prior to filing the lawsuit, provided that it does not exceed one year prior to the date of filing the lawsuit.
The alimony debt is not waived by the death of one of the spouses or by divorce, so if the husband dies, the wife has access to frozen alimony from his inheritance, and if the wife dies, the alimony has been frozen, leaving him on her behalf. Take off in exchange for this freezing of alimony.
Yes, alimony is obligatory for the wife who is not entitled to it from the date of the marriage contract, because the husband’s failure to enter his wife does not prevent her from imposing alimony.
Alimony is estimated according to the husband’s financial and marital status at the time he must spend on his wife.
Yes, it is permissible because the husband’s absence does not prevent the imposition of maintenance on him.
1 – That the marriage contract is valid
2- The custody is achieved in the interest of the husband or the willingness to confinement, even if it is not achieved for a reason not by the wife
The wife’s illness, her left hand, or her disagreement in religion with the husband does not prevent her from being entitled to spousal maintenance.
Yes, it is permissible, and it follows that the husband may not rely on the fact that she is outgoing to leave the marital home for work or study, unless her going out to work is harmful to the interest of the family or exhausts the wife’s strength or illness.
The maintenance of the waiting period is in fact marital alimony because the divorced woman is counted, and includes food, clothing and housing in the judgment of the wife during the waiting period.
The alimony for the child shall be borne by those of his ascendants, whether male or female
Yes, he is obligated, because the school fees are the same as the expenses for the child on his father, like food and clothing.
Yes, it is permissible, because the value of alimony can be increased or decreased according to the economic conditions, as well as the circumstances of the person obligated to spend and also the circumstances of the alimony imposed in his favor.
It is a lawsuit filed by the convict by virtue of alimony – for the wife or children – with a request to nullify or abolish them imposed under the ruling by virtue of which the execution shall be carried out against him in the event that the reason for entitlement to alimony ends.
It is the monetary amount that the person obligated to spend on the incubator pays for her doing an act that is serving the child.
The rule is that the waiting period is obligatory for all divorced women, except for the divorced woman before consummation or seclusion, for she is the only one who does not have to wait for the time period between divorce and marriage.
The waiting period for a divorced woman is retroactive or permanent, three menstrual periods for a woman who menstruates, or three Arab months for those who do not see menstruation due to a young age or reaching the age of menopause.
It starts from the date of the divorce, that is, from the date it took place and not from the date of knowledge of the divorce.
A divorced woman is entitled to the maintenance of the waiting period for a period of not less than sixty days, which is the minimum period for the waiting period and not more than a calendar year, which is the maximum period of waiting
The waiting period is forfeited in cases of the wife’s recalcitrance, apostasy from Islam, or the death of a divorced woman after her elimination.
It is not permissible, unless the waiver of alimony is in exchange for khula.
Pleasure is compensation for the divorced woman for the pain that she suffered as a result of the divorce, and to remove the description of offense from her, and as a testimony that the divorce is not due to a reason for it, but for an excuse that concerns the divorced.
The reason for the necessity of pleasure is the tyrannical divorce from the husband, and the wisdom of its legislation is to redress the risk of the divorced woman from the husband’s abuse of his right to divorce.
To be eligible for pleasure, 4 conditions must be met:
• That the wife has entered into a valid marriage
• The occurrence of divorce between the spouses of any kind
• That the divorce took place without the consent of the wife (extracting the availability of consent is an objective matter in which the judge is independent).
• She should not be the wife who caused the divorce
A divorced woman does not have the right to demand pleasure in divorce over release, except by claiming that she was coerced to forfeit her right to pleasure.
Yes, a divorced woman is entitled, by a court ruling, to obtain compensation for muta’a, considering that the judgment issued for divorce is evidence that the divorce took place without the wife’s consent or with a reason attributed to her.
The ruling issued for the wife’s recalcitrance indicates that the divorce is due to the wife and cursing her, but the wife can prove the opposite.
The pleasure is estimated at the expense of at least two years, and it may be imposed for a longer period of time, depending on the financial and social condition of the divorced person, the circumstances of the divorce and the length of marriage.
Yes, it is permissible – but it must be at the request of the defendant, and it is permissible in installments upon execution
Three conditions are: –
• That the son is poor and has no money. If he has some money but it is not sufficient for him, the father is obligated to complete the rest of it.
• That the son is incapable of earning a living due to youth, femininity, or disability, or to seek knowledge.
• The father is wealthy or able to earn.
The parent is in the state of poverty, and the father, if he claims otherwise, must prove the opposite by all methods of proof established until the age of fifteen – after this age the burden of proof falls on the son.
The son’s alimony on his father is estimated to the father’s left, and the provision of housing for him is included in it
There is no time restriction on hearing this lawsuit, and a minor alimony may be claimed for any period prior to the filing of the lawsuit.
If the son dies and the mother spends on him the maintenance of his life, then she may obtain what she spent on the little one from the father, considering that the alimony of the child is a debt owed by the father.
The entitlement of the incubator to the custody wage remains as long as the child is with her, provided that this wage does not continue to be imposed after the child reaches the maximum age determined for custody, because the hand after this age is a hand of preservation and has no custody status
Yes, the plaintiff may claim the custody wages frozen from the date of his entitlement, without being restricted to a specific period, and she may establish evidence of abstinence, given that the custody wage is one of the wages that are not forfeited except by payment or discharge, and the incubator is entitled to the custody wage even if she loses her validity for her as long as the child is with her.
The right of the female custodian to the custody wage arises from the date of the commencement of custody if she is not the mother of the fostered child and from the date of the expiration of her iddat on the father if she is the mother of the foster child until the young person reaches the maximum age of custody legally established.
Can't Find the Answer?
ask your question
Contact Us
don’t waste your time, resolve the proplem